1. Repositório Institucional - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  2. Faculdade de Odontologia (FOUFU)
  3. TCC - Odontologia
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/19516
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorOliveira, Murilo Navarro-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-17T19:13:56Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-17T19:13:56Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-05-
dc.identifier.citationOLIVEIRA, Murilo Navarro. Comparative analysis of optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography on measurements. 2017. 17 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Odontologia) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2017pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/19516-
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Uberlândiapt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectMeasurementspt_BR
dc.subjectDental Implantspt_BR
dc.subjectOptical Microscopept_BR
dc.subjectMicro-CTpt_BR
dc.subjectElectron Microscopept_BR
dc.titleComparative analysis of optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography on measurementspt_BR
dc.title.alternativeAnálise comparativa de mensurações utilizando microscópio óptico, microscópio eletrônico de varredura e microtomografia computadorizadapt_BR
dc.typeTrabalho de Conclusão de Cursopt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Karam, Frederick Khalil-
dc.contributor.advisor1Prado, Célio Jesus do-
dc.contributor.referee1Oliveira, Andréa Gomes-
dc.contributor.referee2Menezes, Murilo Souza-
dc.description.degreenameTrabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação)pt_BR
dc.description.resumoMicroscopic measurements are widely used in scientific research and the correct equipment to realize these evaluations could be critical to determine the study results. Regarding microscopic measurements, three of the most used methods are: Optical Microscopy (OM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM.), and Micro-computed Tomography (MCT). It is important to select which is the best method for assessing diverse parameters, considering the operational characteristics of the method, the equipment efficiency, and the machinery cost. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to define which is the most useful measurement method for assessing magnitudes below 0.55mm. Ten dental implants, with known dimensions as defined by the manufacturer were randomly distributed. Two blinded observers assessed the distance between the second and the third screw vortex of the implants using the three suggested methods. The true distance was defined to be 0.6mm. The assessed distances were. 0.597±0.007 for OM, 0.578±0.017 for SEM, and 0.613±0.006 for MCT. The assessed distances were significantly different when the methods were compared (P>0.01). Despite these differences, all measurements were between the CAD system tolerance, defined to be within 0.05mm. It was possible to conclude that linear measurements below 0.55mm can be performed by any of the described methods.pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.courseOdontologiapt_BR
dc.sizeorduration16pt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA::MATERIAIS ODONTOLOGICOSpt_BR
Appears in Collections:TCC - Odontologia

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ComparativeAnalysisOptical.pdfTCC2.38 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.