Intempestividade do/no corpo nietzschiano : análise da discursividade filosófica

Abstract

This research revolves around the problematic of thinking the body in Nietzsche (2011) from the field of the French discourse analysis. Two general objectives that should be highlighted were selected a priori: i) work with the nietzschean philosophical discourse in an evident way, by the game this author establish with the language, and its constituent elements; (ii) analyze how the untimeliness of notions-concepts, based on other Nietzsche philosophical treaties provide edges to the body of Zarathustra. I use notions-concepts of Foucault (2001a, 2001b, 2001c, 2001d, 2001e, 2007, 2008, 2011, 2013th, 2013b) Discourse , statement , event , will to power / knowledge , will to truth , resistance . The theoretical-analytical démarche is developed in three moments, the first being responsible for establish a discussion about the philosophical discourse in the field of philosophy and linguistics, seeking to constitute an otherness and establishing an effective dialogue between them. In the second one, I present the notion-concept of cartography of a body as a relevant tool to understand the operation of the speech and the enunciation in the spelling of the body of Zarathustra. There is the analysis, at this moment, of the Nietzschean criticism about the notion of rationality and conscience , as well as an interpretation proposal of how these criticisms happen on the corporal constitution of Zarathustra. Looking up, still, to throw a glance over the digestive metaphors employed by Nietzsche (2011), highlighting the discourses they establish in the body of Zarathustra constitution. On the third moment, finally, I analyze the body subversion founded by Nietzsche (2011) through the spelling of the body of Zarathustra, outlining that the practice of writing in blood becomes possible from another subject constitution in language practices. There is the comprehension that the language provides edges to the body that accentuate incompleteness, considering that, under a discourse bias, the interpretation comprehends something unfinished. I consider relevant to mention that I also seek to think in this third stage, the Nietzschean scriptural practice as a gesture that founds theatricality and games of presence and absence through the body of Zarathustra. Therefore, by the trajectory undertaken, I can conclude that notion-concepts, such as, for example, Will to Power , Nihilism , Eternal Return , superman emerge in the body of Zarathustra, through the gesture of body diagram initiated by Nietzsche (2011), while (i) memory effects from which alreadysaid emerge in the spelling of the zaratustriano body as never-said; (ii) discourses that begin others practices in the history thread and (iii) enunciates that show, in the subversion of the zaratustriano body as a sign, specific functions of the discursive/enunciative nietzschian event.