Campo-relação na clínica do conjugal: reflexões psicanalíticas sobre a cultura hoje

Abstract

This study proposes a reflexive work on conjugality, through the investigation of matrimonial relationships beyond the model of reproductive heterosexual alliance that has been orientating the existence of sexuality and intimacy in modern times. It evaluates the perspective of durability of the unions in the romantic project compared to the transiency of the current unions, orientated by a conception logic: consume production. It puts in subject which is the condition of sustainability of a matrimonial relationship nowadays, and its implication to love. It aims to investigate the conjugality field, considering its differentiation condition and the creation of new meanings in the way of conjugating and constituting reality. It discusses forms of alterity and articulation among theoretical perspectives in the couple's clinic, having as central point the psychoanalytic method of field rupture sustained by theoretical articulations of Campos' Theory with intention of knowledge production. It develops a thinking of the culture clinic, starting from three ruptures that happened in the social-historical field that influenced the present conjugality conception: the marriage, the feminine and the link logic determined by globalization and hypermodernity. It presents as analyzers the notion of field and paradox, having as hypothesis the transforming capacity of conjugality in the hard game between the one and the multiple that the social project of the present times institutes us. Through a clinical eye of the matrimonial psyche, some singularities of each relationship have been revealed and, using a set of learned common senses, an analysis of the culture in the clinic have been delimited. It has been found that the matrimonial project, or its representation in a crisis condition, erects a multiplicity of senses that, paradoxically, standardizes the relationships and also makes possible the rising of another sensibility in this field, in other words, it makes a paradoxical critic of these. Nowadays, there is the conjugality as a project of the subjects, as an defined indefinition. Such possibilities are already in place, because the alterity in the condition of present fragility, still persists and insists. As it is known: it is in the moment of crisis that one is destined to the new and the unexpected.