Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/30494
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Allig, Gabriela Resende | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-26T18:46:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-26T18:46:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | ALLIG, Gabriela Resende. Influence of finishing and polishing protocols and light curing units on the surface roughness and gloss of a composite resin. 2020. 20 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Odontologia) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2020. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/30494 | - |
dc.language | eng | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | Universidade Federal de Uberlândia | pt_BR |
dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | pt_BR |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.subject | Composite resin | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Finishing and polishing | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Light emitted diode | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Light cure unit | pt_BR |
dc.title | Influence of finishing and polishing protocols and light curing units on the surface roughness and gloss of a composite resin. | pt_BR |
dc.type | Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1 | Cardoso, Igor Oliveiros | - |
dc.contributor.advisor1 | Simamoto Júnior, Paulo Cézar | - |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes | http://lattes.cnpq.br/3316615944784016 | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.referee1 | Zeola, Lívia Favaro | - |
dc.contributor.referee2 | Santos Filho, Paulo César de Freitas | - |
dc.description.degreename | Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação) | pt_BR |
dc.description.resumo | The aim of this study was to evaluate different Light Cure Unit (LCU) and polishing protocols on surface roughness and gloss of a composite resin. Roughness and gloss of samples (n=8) of nanohybrid composite resin (E1, VOCO Cuxhaven, Hamburg, Germany) were evaluated and lightcured with different light-emitting diode (LED) devices: Valo (Ultradent, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA), Valo Grand (Ultradent, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA), Bluephase 20i (Ivoclar, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Elipar DeepCure-L (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA), Emitter D (Schuster, Hyannis, MA, USA) and Radii Xpert (SDI Bayswater, Survey, Australia); and polished with three different systems: Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA), Jiffy Original Composite System (Ultradent, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) and Opti1Step (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). There was no difference for the different LEDs for roughness (P=0.935) and gloss (P=0.012). For the superficial roughness test Sof-Lex and Opti1Step were similar between themselves and significantly superior to Jiffy. For the gloss test Sof-Lex and Opti1Step presented superior results than Jiffy. The LCU did not influence the roughness and gloss of the composite resin, while the polishing protocol showed influence on the result. | pt_BR |
dc.publisher.country | Brasil | pt_BR |
dc.publisher.course | Odontologia | pt_BR |
dc.sizeorduration | 20 | pt_BR |
dc.subject.cnpq | CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA::MATERIAIS ODONTOLOGICOS | pt_BR |
dc.description.embargo | 2022-11-09 | - |
Appears in Collections: | TCC - Odontologia |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
InfluenceFinishingPolishing .pdf | TCC | 315.17 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License