Diálogos sobre sexualidade: aproximações e distanciamentos nos discursos de licenciados/as de Ciências Biológicas bolsistas do PIBID/UFU

Abstract

This research questions the sexuality discourses presented by Biological Sciences undergraduates and is embedded in the Education in Science and Mathematics of the Master Course in the Education Postgraduate Program study line at the Federal University of Uberlândia. The following core questions move the research: Wich undergraduates speeches of the Biological Sciences Course active in PIBID/UFU, in the subproject \"Biology\" in the Umuarama Campus and Pontal Campus presents about sexuality? The undergraduates articulate their speeches with their future role as teachers in the primary education? To answer these questions, we propose the following objective: to present the similarities and differences between the discourses on sexuality of a group of undergraduates in Biology Sciences, as well as possible connections that they make between these discourses and their future role teaching. It is a qualitative nature research, since it brings a kind of intrinsic approach that considers the complexity of the search field, sexuality, and socio-cultural, power and knowledge relations that constitutes it. The people under the research are 28 undergraduates in the Biological Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Umuarama Campus and Pontal Campus, scholarships of PIBID, subproject \"Biology\". The theoretical reference was based on the works of Foucault, in particular in the History of Sexuality and studies in the fields of sexuality, gender and education. The information was obtained from questionnaire, interviews and two focus groups. The analysis structure is based upon the notion of discourse of Michel Foucault and, therefore, focused to the location of the subject of the statements, the location of the statements, speech places and the possible relationship between the discourses on sexuality. The analysis indicates that the undergraduates, bring in their speeches the perception that sexuality must be understood beyond biology, but they can not break away from the plot of the hegemonic discourse and its speech place is strongly grounded in their process academic training, ie, the biological dimension of sexuality. About articulate their discourses with future teaching practice, by one side, the undergraduates doesn\'t escape the biological dimension of sexuality and by the other, they doesn\'t seem to realize this entanglement where they live.