<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Community:</title>
    <link>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/5164</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 18:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-08-22T18:12:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Política de tolerância zero no primeiro governo Trump: violações de direitos humanos e impactos sobre crianças migrantes</title>
      <link>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49728</link>
      <description>Title: Política de tolerância zero no primeiro governo Trump: violações de direitos humanos e impactos sobre crianças migrantes
Abstract: This study analyzes the Zero Tolerance Policy adopted during Donald Trump’s first&#xD;
administration (2017-2021) and its effects on migrant children in the United States. The&#xD;
objective is to understand how this policy affected children’s rights and what was new about it&#xD;
compared to previous administrations. A qualitative, bibliographic and documentary approach&#xD;
was adopted, based on books, scientific articles, legislation, official documents, reports from&#xD;
international and human rights organizations, and journalistic sources. It is argued that Zero&#xD;
Tolerance did not constitute an unprecedented rupture, but rather the generalization of existing&#xD;
legal and administrative instruments: the main change was the elimination of the exceptions&#xD;
that had preserved family unity, which turned separation into a regular consequence of border&#xD;
enforcement. As they were not the targets of criminal prosecution, children came to bear part&#xD;
of the costs of criminalizing their guardians, suffering physical, psychological, and social&#xD;
impacts that persisted after the policy’s formal suspension. It is concluded that migration&#xD;
control, when detached from child protection, can produce serious humanitarian consequences,&#xD;
highlighting the need to reconcile state sovereignty with the rights of migrant children.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49728</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-07-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Estrutura e desempenho: a dinâmica da indústria de transformação em função dos gastos das famílias, à luz da teoria kaleckiana (2007-2023)</title>
      <link>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49710</link>
      <description>Title: Estrutura e desempenho: a dinâmica da indústria de transformação em função dos gastos das famílias, à luz da teoria kaleckiana (2007-2023)
Abstract: This study analyzes the relationship between the performance of the Brazilian manufacturing industry and the dynamics of household income between 2007 and 2023, based on Michal Kalecki’s theoretical framework. The analysis employs key variables such as the Value of Industrial Transformation (VTI), the real minimum wage, household credit, fixed capital investment, personnel expenditures in manufacturing, and the level of capacity utilization. The central hypothesis argues that, in underdeveloped economies, increases in household income constitute a necessary but insufficient condition for sustained industrial dynamism due to structural supply constraints, institutional limitations, and distributive conflicts. The findings indicate that the growth cycle observed between 2007 and 2014 was associated with the expansion of credit, minimum wage appreciation, and stronger state participation in long-term financing, particularly through BNDES operations. However, from 2015 onward, the retrenchment of income policies, fiscal austerity measures, and the increase in long-term credit costs weakened the sustainability of private investment. The results also show that even during periods of income expansion, inflationary pressures on non-durable goods and structural bottlenecks limited the consolidation of a virtuous cycle between domestic demand and industrial production. The Brazilian experience confirms Kalecki’s argument that development constraints are primarily political and institutional in nature, requiring coordinated policies that integrate long-term investment, income distribution, and structural transformation.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49710</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-06-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quão eficaz é o regime de metas de inflação em um possível triplo mandato no Brasil?</title>
      <link>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49699</link>
      <description>Title: Quão eficaz é o regime de metas de inflação em um possível triplo mandato no Brasil?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49699</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-07-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rrevisão exploratória sobre sistema nacional de inovação e ecoinovação: quando as trajetórias de desenvolvimento encontram os limites ambientais</title>
      <link>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49688</link>
      <description>Title: Rrevisão exploratória sobre sistema nacional de inovação e ecoinovação: quando as trajetórias de desenvolvimento encontram os limites ambientais
Abstract: This monograph examines the relationship between the National Innovation System (NIS) and eco-innovation, based on the understanding that technological change arises from learning processes and interactions among firms, universities, research institutions, government, the financial system, and other organizations. Its objective is to analyze how capabilities built within NISs can support the generation and diffusion of eco-innovations and why such capabilities, by themselves, do not ensure positive environmental outcomes. The study is qualitative and exploratory and was conducted through a literature review. The review indicates that innovation and eco-innovation rely on common knowledge, skills, financing mechanisms, and cooperation networks, while the double externality of eco-innovation increases the relevance of regulation and public coordination. It also shows that a developed NIS does not automatically become environmentally sustainable, since its capabilities may remain tied to resource- and pollution-intensive production paths. The study concludes that the environmental direction of the system is as important as its overall innovation capacity and that further theoretical integration between the two fields is still needed.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49688</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-07-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

