https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/5143 Wed, 12 Aug 2026 07:50:42 GMT 2026-08-12T07:50:42Z https://repositorio.ufu.br:443/retrieve/c16b399d-849e-449f-92b5-f1c46d316d4b/ https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/5143 https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49420 Title: Mandado de Injunção N° 4.733: análise crítica hermenêutica da decisão tese do Supremo Tribunal Federal sob a perspectiva da dogmática penal brasileira Abstract: The Federal Supreme Court (STF) has faced increasing criticism due to its stance of judicial activism, manifested in decisions that impact various sectors of society. This study analyzes the judgment of Writ of Injunction N°. 4733, which equated the conducts of homophobia and transphobia with conducts motivated by racial prejudice (Law N°. 7.716/89). The focus lies on the viability of extensive interpretation as a basis for such criminalization and the possible developments of the decision in question. The research was based on various doctrines of hermeneutics and legal interpretation, Criminal and Constitutional Law, as well as other sources addressing the concepts of gender and race. Thus, the study concludes that the ruling violates the principle of strict legality and the legal reserve. It is argued that there was a mistaken interpretation of Art. 5°, items XLI and XLII of the Federal Constitution, resulting in the application of an analogy in malam partem, which is prohibited by the criminal legal system. Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49420 2026-02-24T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49414 Title: Gratuidade de justiça e litigância abusiva: a (Im)prescindibilidade da comprovação da hipossuficiência econômica Abstract: This article aims to critically analyze the legal institute of free legal aid within the Brazilian legal system, focusing on the controversy surrounding the (in)dispensability of proving financial insufficiency for its granting. It seeks to highlight the consequences arising from the lack of objective criteria in the assessment of such requests, a circumstance that enables the filing of frivolous litigation. From this perspective, based on an examination of the intrinsic relationship between the indiscriminate granting of free legal aid and abusive litigation, this study demonstrates the impacts generated on the Judiciary, especially with regard to the hyper-judicialization of disputes and the financial burdens borne by the public treasury. The research is grounded in recent empirical data published by the National Council of Justice (CNJ), particularly from the Justice in Numbers reports, which reveal the volume of lawsuits and the rate of free legal aid concessions. Furthermore, it provides a critical analysis of the recent thesis established by the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) in the judgment of Theme No. 1,178, comparing and contrasting it with Bill No. 2,239/2022, currently under consideration in the National Congress, as well as with the position of Justice Gilmar Mendes at the Federal Supreme Court (STF) in labor matters, whose effects extend to the civil sphere. Finally, the study examines the legal distinctions in granting free legal aid to natural people and legal entities, with particular emphasis on the rules applicable to individual microentrepreneurs and sole proprietors. Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49414 2026-07-16T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49382 Title: Dress code e aparência: o poder diretivo do empregador e a desigualdade de gênero Abstract: This study sought to analyze the legal limits of an employer's managerial authority regarding the regulation of appearance in the workplace, focusing on the protection of women and the promotion of substantive equality. It proceeds from the understanding that dress codes and aesthetic requirements are not neutral elements; rather, they can function as mechanisms of symbolic control and the reproduction of gender inequalities. The study examines the compatibility of these practices with fundamental rights—specifically human dignity, equality, non-discrimination, and personality rights—in light of the Federal Constitution and Brazilian labor law. Methodologically, the study employs a literature review involving a systematic analysis of legal doctrine, scientific articles, legal norms, and institutional documents relevant to labor law and gender issues. A deductive method is used, moving from general constitutional principles to the analysis of specific situations involving the exercise of managerial authority and the imposition of appearance standards. The research demonstrates that, although the legal system grants employers the right to establish internal rules, this prerogative faces clear legal limits when it results in direct or indirect discriminatory effects. It concludes that the legitimacy of appearance regulations depends on adherence to the principles of reasonableness, proportionality, and substantive equality. Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49382 2026-03-05T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49362 Title: Da hegemonia do biocentrismo ao reconhecimento do afeto: a eficácia da Justiça multiportas no Direito das Famílias brasileiro Abstract: Cet article analyse la transition paradigmatique du droit de la famille au Brésil, en étudiant le passage d'un biocentrisme absolu à la reconnaissance de l'affection comme valeur juridique autonome. L'étude retrace l'évolution historique du concept de filiation, depuis la rigueur patrimoniale et discriminatoire du Code civil de 1916 jusqu'à l'avènement de la « vérité biopsychosociale » consolidée par la Constitution fédérale de 1988 et la jurisprudence contemporaine de la Cour Suprême Fédérale (Sujet 622). L'objectif principal est d'évaluer l'efficacité du système de justice à plusieurs portes – composé de mécanismes tels que les Defenseurs Públiques, les CEJUSC et les services extrajudiciaires – pour garantir la dignité et la visibilité des familles polygames. La méthodologie repose sur une recherche bibliographique et documentaire, avec une analyse des cadres réglementaires, notamment les dispositions n° 63/2017 et n° 83/2019 du Conseil National de Justice (CNJ). Il a été constaté que la déjudiciarisation des liens socio-affectifs agit comme un instrument de pacification sociale et de protection de la psyché familiale, en permettant la reconnaissance de l'« amour responsable » tout au long de la vie, et en s'affranchissant de la lenteur et de la rigidité des procédures judiciaires. On en conclut que le système de justice à plusieurs portes constitue un refuge pour la citoyenneté affective, consolidant l'affection comme source de parenté capable de produire des effets juridiques complets et favorisant l'épanouissement existentiel des individus. Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49362 2026-03-05T00:00:00Z