https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/5143 Thu, 21 May 2026 16:42:46 GMT 2026-05-21T16:42:46Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48685 Title: O direito fundamental à desindexação na promoção da pessoa digital Abstract: Immersed in a world where the use of information and communication technology no longer remains confined to the virtual space but increasingly penetrates the physical sphere, the effects associated with the application of these systems in various social domains significantly impact the functioning of social subsystems. In this context, this work proposes to study the right to de-indexing within the Brazilian legal system. De-indexing refers to the process of removing specific content or links from a search engine’s index, preventing them from appearing in search results. This procedure is often requested by individuals seeking to restrict the visibility of online information that may be outdated, irrelevant, or harmful to their reputation. Therefore, the central issue of this research is the improper use of a person’s name by search engines, and it starts from the hypothesis that the Brazilian legal framework contains grounds for recognizing a right to de-indexing. Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48685 2026-02-26T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48657 Title: Discurso proselitista contrarreligioso: categorias decisórias nos RHCs 134.682 e 146.303 Abstract: This study aims to identify and analyze, in light of the selected theoretical framework, the decision-making parameters effectively mobilized by the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal - STF) in RHC 134.682 and RHC 146.303, both adjudicated in cases involving counter-religious proselytizing speech. To this end, the research adopts Discursive Textual Analysis (DTA), a qualitative method in which language plays a central role in understanding the phenomenon, as it represents the intermediation of the human element in the scientific process, proving suitable for the examination of judicial decisions. The method comprises the texts’ deconstruction (unitization), their reconstruction (categorization), and the metatexts’ production (communication), following a non-linear analytical path applied to the research “corpus” (the judicial decisions), selected through jurisprudential research conducted in the STF’s electronic database. This methodological approach is justified by the increasingly prominent role judicial decisions play in the interpretation and application of law. The categories that emerged from the analysis of RHC 134.682 were: (i) the special status of religious freedom; (ii) the constitutional dimension of decision-making parameters; (iii) criminal law bases; (iv) a three-stage test for the characterization of hate speech; and (v) contextual criteria for evaluating speech, each comprising its own subcategories. These categories were subsequently employed as an interpretive framework to identify continuities, shifts, and silences of meaning in the examination of RHC 146.303. In the latter case, the following were identified: (i) religious expression as a derivative of freedom of expression (thus, not possessing a special status); (ii) the constitutional dimension of decision-making parameters (with partial reformulation of prior understanding); and (iii) criminal law bases, while the remaining categories identified in the first decision were not mobilized as ratio decidendi due to a divergence in the underlying reasoning concerning the scope of protection afforded to speech. The findings indicate a partial shift from the understanding adopted in RHC 134.682, accompanied by a reduction in the decision-making categories’ density through an increased level of abstraction in relation to the concrete case. The critical conclusion, in light of the adopted theoretical framework, is that RHC 134.682 provides more consistent and reliable parameters. The methodological path’s internal coherence suggests that the identified decisional shifts resulted not from differences in the object of adjudication, but from changes in the judicial reasoning mobilized by the Court. Accordingly, although both judgments present interpretive gaps that warrant further theoretical development, their use as judicial precedents must take into account the specific nature of the subject matter - counter-religious proselytizing speech. Extending either ratio decidendi to hate speech cases in general may therefore be misleading, notwithstanding the greater theoretical and decisional coherence observed in RHC 134.682 when compared to RHC 146.303 in light of the selected legal literature. Mon, 23 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48657 2026-02-23T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48649 Title: Logística reversa no agronegócio brasileiro à luz da Lei 12.305/2010: ESG como ferramenta para garantia de equidade intergeracional Abstract: This dissertation analyzes the National Solid Waste Policy, established by Law No. 12,305/2010, as a fundamental legal instrument for promoting sustainable development in Brazil, focusing on the challenges and potential of agribusiness. It begins with a historicalevolutionary approach to the relationship between humans and the environment, highlighting how population growth, industrialization, and technological advancement have intensified the exploitation of natural resources and the generation of solid waste, demonstrating the importance of regulating environmental protection. The work examines how, since the promulgation of the 1988 Constitution, an ecologically balanced environment has been recognized as a fundamental right, and the economic order must observe environmental protection, thus demonstrating the role of Environmental Law as an instrument of social transformation. In this context, the National Solid Waste Policy is analyzed based on its principles, objectives, and instruments, with emphasis on shared responsibility for the product life cycle, reverse logistics, and the internalization of environmental costs, understood as essential mechanisms for reorganizing production and consumption patterns. Brazilian agribusiness is addressed as a strategic sector of the national economy and, at the same time, as a significant source of solid waste generation, such as pesticide packaging, agro-industrial waste, animal manure, and byproducts of agricultural processing. The research demonstrates that the proper management of these wastes can lead to the modernization of production, in addition to adding economic value to the sector and strengthening international competitiveness, especially in the face of increasing environmental, social, and governance demands. The role of the State as responsible for guiding the transformation towards sustainable agricultural practices is also analyzed, through integrated public policies, consistent environmental regulation, and the use of economic and financial instruments capable of guiding behaviors and internalizing environmental externalities. Agroecology and the National Policy on Agroecology and Organic Production are examined as expressions of new productive paradigms, compatible with the objectives of the National Solid Waste Policy and with the constitutional foundations of sustainable development. Finally, this work identifies structural challenges to the effective implementation of sustainability in Brazilian agribusiness, such as institutional fragmentation, regional inequalities, power asymmetry among economic agents, and the fragility of environmental oversight. It concludes that the effectiveness of the National Solid Waste Policy depends on integrated state action, institutional strengthening, and a constitutionally oriented interpretation of Environmental Law, capable of reconciling agricultural productivity, environmental protection, and intergenerational justice. Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48649 2026-02-27T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48581 Title: Entre a repressão e a regulamentação: o jogo do bicho e as apostas esportivas online sob a ótica do processo penal brasileiro Abstract: This study examines the Brazilian legal-criminal treatment of gambling through the contrast between the persistent criminalization of the jogo do bicho and the recent regulation of online sports betting (bets). It argues that this normative duality does not stem from material differences between the practices, but from political-criminal choices shaped by economic, moral, and social criteria, which historically structure a pattern of penal selectivity. The research analyzes the historical origins of the jogo do bicho, its links to popular culture and the criminalization of marginalized groups, as well as the institutionalization of online sports betting under a discourse of modernization, fiscal revenue, and administrative regulation. It further explores the consequences of this asymmetry for criminal typicity, the definition of predicate offenses in money laundering prosecutions, and the functioning of criminal procedure, highlighting the coexistence of an expansive penal approach toward stigmatized practices and a subsidiary penal model applied to market-integrated activities. Finally, the paper assesses the role of the Judiciary in partially restraining punitive excesses and in functionally redefining the concept of gambling, while also identifying the limits of judicial action in light of the persistence of anachronistic criminal contraventions. The study concludes that overcoming normative incoherence and penal selectivity requires a critical reassessment of gambling criminal policy, grounded in the principles of minimal criminal law, equality before the law, and criminal intervention as ultima ratio, in accordance with the Democratic Rule of Law. Fri, 06 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48581 2026-03-06T00:00:00Z