https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/18947 Sat, 04 Apr 2026 05:53:56 GMT 2026-04-04T05:53:56Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48579 Title: Educação antirracista no ensino médio: as contribuições dos movimentos teóricos sobre a aplicação da lei 10.639/03 Abstract: Consideration of ethnic-racial diversity is one of the principles of national education, along with equal conditions for access and permanence in school and the pluralism of ideas and pedagogical conceptions. The possibility of discussing anti-racism education in schools today is the result of a long historical process of struggle by black movements. Given the recorgnition tha Law nº 10.639/03 aims to challenge Eurocentric logic and promote the decolonization of knowledge in the school environment, the central question guiding our investigation was: In what ways do insurgente theretical perspectives – originating from the Black Movement and decolonial thought –underpin the implementation of the aforementioned law and contribute to the decolonization of curricula? Furthermore, what are the institucional limits na structural resistances within public schools that hinder the consolidation of these theories into an effectively anti-racist and tranformative praxis? We adopted a qualitative and situated approach, grounded in the perspective of the Black Movement as an "educating subject" (Gomes, 2017). This research was conducted through a bibliographic review and systematic analysis of national (SciELO and Google Scholar) and regional scientific production, spanning from 2019 to 2024. We prioritized mapping the production in the Repository of the Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU) to establish a territorialized nexus between academic theory and the practical reality of local public schools, where the researcher's teaching activity serves as a point of observation and socio-legal analysis. The general objective is to study Anti-Racist Education in High School, proposing a rupture with the dominant Eurocentric logic. To this end, we aim to meet the following specific objectives: 1) to study the application of Law No. 10,639/03 in High School through the perspectives of liberatory education and the problematization of whiteness; 2) to contextualize the challenges of implementing Law 10,639/03 based on recent production from the UFU Repository; and 3) to analyze discrimination in the school environment through the lenses of intersectionality and Lélia Gonzalez’s "Amefricanity." We conclude that, although the academic production from teaching degrees regarding Law No. 10,639/03 is exhaustive and consolidated, there remains a need for a socio-legal dialogue that translates this knowledge into the field of Law from the perspective of situated knowledge. We emphasize that addressing racial and gender inequalities in the school environment requires the application of Gonzalez's (2020) intersectionality and Amefricanity to unveil the specific oppressions that cross the trajectories of Black girls. Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48579 2025-02-21T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48440 Title: Quem decide o futuro? A disputa simbólica dos três poderes no caso das emendas parlamentares sob a lente da análise dialógica do discurso Abstract: Who has the legitimacy to have the final say regarding the future of the State? Is it the Supreme Federal Court? The President of the Republic? The National Congress? Is it the Academy? In short, among so many possible agents, there is a clear institutional dispute over the benefit of the monopoly of the right to determine the future of the State and the transposition of the final outcome to substantive issues concerning fundamental rights and Brazilian political institutions. This is the trophy sought by agents in the political field, according to a Brazilian perspective that was identified during the proposed research, and who dispute among themselves the ultimate legitimacy to define what the future of the country should be. This master's research outlines the agents, tools, and positions that surround the aforementioned political field, as well as identifying the forms of symbolic domination exercised discursively among them. Thus, in addition to merely describing the field, the aim is to create a diagram of its institutional dynamics and propose an interpretative key to its intentions that are expressed through language, making use of dialogical discourse analysis. By uniting Bakhtin and Bourdieu, each with their own field of study, an interdisciplinary approach is proposed to address the questions posed, with the objective of ultimately identifying how agents in the legal field behave discursively in pursuit of the monopoly on the right to dictate the future of the State. Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48440 2026-02-12T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48414 Title: O direito à proteção dos dados neurais sob a ótica do dever de segurança ao consumidor: limites ao desenvolvimento das interfaces cérebro computador Abstract: This research addresses the problem of consumer vulnerability in the face of emerging neurotechnologies. Among these, brain-computer interfaces, the object of massive investments by global industries, present the greatest challenges to maintaining the protective scope of law, operationalized in the protection of individual and collective human rights. Therefore, the focus was on a detailed understanding of their functioning, the threats they represent, and the social, political, and legal repercussions arising from their offering and use by consumers. It was found that, in Brazil, there is no specific regulation in force to limit their development, a scenario that contributes to the susceptibility to exploitation and violation of users' fundamental rights by neurotechnology providers. Given this, and aiming to construct a specific response to the gap identified in the Brazilian legal system, the work used a hypothetical-deductive approach, based on the constitutional duty of security as a major premise, in light of which the propositions indispensable to its testing were formulated. The work's structure was divided into three parts, the first being predominantly conceptual and descriptive, dedicated to understanding the topic from different conceptual and analytical perspectives across multiple sciences. It highlighted neural data, neurotechnologies, and brain-computer interfaces, as well as the risks and legal formulations discussed within the regulatory framework: neurorights and neurolaw. Throughout the research, the foreign and national context was analyzed within the context of the Americas, both North and South, a selection based on the two main currents addressing the protection of neural data. Having assimilated the fundamental epistemological assumptions for addressing the problem, the research sought to condense the theoretical and political contributions presented in the first sections, suggesting a reinterpretation of neural data protection from a new analysis of Law and the available hermeneutical tools. In conclusion, it was found that despite the divergences and lack of consensus on fundamental points, a response from the State and legal professionals to the dangers of brain-computer interfaces is necessary. This presupposes the unavoidable task of establishing limits to their creation, offering, and use, not according to rigid and fixed rules established by law, but through the formulation of anchoring paradigms established according to the various sciences involved in the user's relationship with neurotechnologies. To this end, understanding Law as a system proved elementary and fostered the core guidelines for maintaining its ultimate objectives, enabling the interdisciplinary articulation of important points from medicine, philosophy, sociology, law, and technology around concentric angles of legal radiation and protection, under a critical and constructive approach to the protection of neural data. Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48414 2026-02-19T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/47839 Title: A polícia judiciária brasileira no seculo XXI: entre o eficientismo ex parte príncipis e o garantismo ex parte populi Abstract: The debate on public security has gained a great prominence in Brazil in recent years. The increasing crime rates and the worrying military and technological apparatus presented by criminal organizations have provoked a constant clash between those who believe that a re-enactment of state repression (expansionism of Criminal Law) is necessary and those who intend that the moment is to strengthen the movement guarantor (criminal minimalism) as a way to stop the escalation of violence. Among fundamental rights, once again the balance oscillates between security - ex parte principis - and freedom - ex parte populi. For some, the whole system is in crisis. In the middle of the discussion is the Brazilian Judicial Police, which seeks every day to reinvent itself in the face of constant charges to be an agent for the promotion of punitive social control also to play the role of first guarantor of fundamental rights in the criminal justice system. In the exercise of its mandate, the Brazilian judicial police in the 21st century should begin to review its main investigative tool, which is the police investigation. Overcoming anachronistic conceptions about this institute and inciting debates that could value the police investigation as a guarantor instrument in the service of a democratic and republican criminal justice system seems to be the beginning. Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/47839 2019-04-05T00:00:00Z