<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/17969</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 06:27:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-07-28T06:27:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>O controle judicial de constitucionalidade sob a ótica da democracia participativa: a potencialidade da razão cidadã na contenção da erosão democrática</title>
      <link>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49110</link>
      <description>Title: O controle judicial de constitucionalidade sob a ótica da democracia participativa: a potencialidade da razão cidadã na contenção da erosão democrática
Abstract: This paper seeks to understand how the judicial review can be resignified through a deliberative and participatory democratic theory - especially the one proposed by Cristina Lafont - in order to make this instrument more responsive to democracy, while equally capable of fostering the development of public reason and citizenry learning processes. This legal-philosophical research, through a deductive and qualitative approach, aimed to understand the potential of participatory democracy in contexts such as Brazil's to prevent attacks on democracy and democratic erosion from becoming more common and frequent. The study concludes that the expansion of participatory and deliberative mechanisms within the scope of judicial review can mitigate democratic erosion processes, reduce the political alienation of citizens, and strengthen institutional stability, thereby transforming an instrument traditionally viewed as counter-majoritarian into an element of democratic consolidation and the public validation of rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49110</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-03-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fake News no contexto eleitoral: limites à liberdade de expressão e a proteção do Estado Democrático de Direito na era digital</title>
      <link>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49069</link>
      <description>Title: Fake News no contexto eleitoral: limites à liberdade de expressão e a proteção do Estado Democrático de Direito na era digital</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49069</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-03-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Entre direitos e alvos: a seletividade da vida no âmbito brasileiro</title>
      <link>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49032</link>
      <description>Title: Entre direitos e alvos: a seletividade da vida no âmbito brasileiro</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49032</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-02-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A efetividade da Lei nº 14.181/2021 sobre a concessão irresponsável de créditos  bancários: medidas para a prevenção e tratamento do superendividamento no Brasil</title>
      <link>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49018</link>
      <description>Title: A efetividade da Lei nº 14.181/2021 sobre a concessão irresponsável de créditos  bancários: medidas para a prevenção e tratamento do superendividamento no Brasil
Abstract: This paper analyzes the effectiveness of Law No. 14.181/2021 in combating over-indebtedness, considering its prevention and treatment measures in Brazil. To this end, the text explores the fundamentals of the phenomenon, addressing its historical and socioeconomic causes, such as irresponsible lending and a lack of financial education. The research highlights the importance of responsible lending and criticizes banks' credit-granting practices without properly assessing consumers' repayment capacity, demonstrating how the lack of clear and ethical guidelines on the part of financial institutions contributed to the escalation of the problem. Furthermore, the paper addresses the concept of the existential minimum as a value that guarantees a dignified subsistence for individuals and criticizes Decrees No. 11.150/2022 and No. 11.567/2023, which limit this guarantee. The text concludes by analyzing the prevention and treatment measures provided for in the law, seeking to understand their challenges and potential in protecting consumer rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49018</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-09-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

