https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/24860 2026-04-06T05:32:12Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48139 Title: A rosa de então subsiste no nome Abstract: The following text presents the professional trajectory of Professor Anselmo Tadeu Ferreira, PhD, who taught at the Institute of Philosophy as a substitute professor for 8 years between 1997 and 2006 and as a tenured professor from 2009 until 2025, when he met the requirements to apply for promotion to full professor. The text thus traces the various stages of his professional training, his work as a teacher and researcher in the field of medieval philosophy, and his administrative duties at the Federal University of Uberlândia, where he was coordinator of the undergraduate course in Philosophy and the postgraduate program in Philosophy. It also addresses, in a theoretical manner, some issues he studied throughout his career, especially the notion of science in medieval philosophy and the theory of the soul in its relation to the problem of universals. 2025-12-11T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/46351 Title: Por uma cultura do estudo: do canavial de Barão Geraldo à Escola de Uberlândia 2025-06-24T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/44056 Title: A paixão e a escada. Philia para filosofar. do largo de São Francisco para o cerrado Abstract: This memoir is my personal and academic narrative, a discursive metaphor for a way of thinking that begins in adolescence and transforms over the course of an intellectual and professional career. From my first degree, Biology, until I found myself with both feet planted in Philosophy, I narrate my memories through the history of encounters and philia. A staircase and a building in the center of Rio de Janeiro set the tone for this writing. Based on my teaching and research, I open this work by wandering through clippings and autobiographical portraits of a Brazilian philosopher. To begin with, I pay a kind of reverence to those who have preceded me as a woman and as a researcher. Now, these are my academic memoirs, and they deal with the trajectory of this carioca woman who was born in Tijuca and raised there. It's the story of a passion fueled by philia. A kind of otobiography, as Jacques Derrida thought. After all, in my clippings, what matters is giving another meaning to my biography and my signature. That's why, from the beginning of my degree, there was a close link between my experiences and my intellectual production. And, in the wake of Derrida, I point out that we can only artificially separate a text from its author's life. There is nothing disinterested in the experiences I accumulate. My memoir, therefore, aims to listen to the experiences of this teacher who is always in training, who wants to be a Brazilian philosopher. So, more than an otobiography, I am, as Conceição Evaristo calls it, writing experiences. It is my life that is written in experience, writing the world I face. Escrevivendo, then, documents my formation and journey until the second semester of 2024. It records important experiences and activities that have shaped my work as a teacher and researcher. The document is structured in five chapters, in addition to the Introduction and Preamble. The first, A Flâneuse in Search of Passion and Knowledge, recounts my journey from my earliest studies to graduating in Philosophy at IFCS-UFRJ. In this chapter, I also recount memories of my Master's and Doctorate. Chapter II, A New Home: A Philosopher in the Cerrado, tells my story at UFU, from 2008 to the present day. Chapter III, An Appendix or Other Places of Philia, talks about the meetings via NEAB and ANPOF and how it was worth dreaming about and falling in love with philosophy. Chapter IV, Epilogue: A Boat With Many Seas to Sail, presents itself as a closing of the text, without a conclusion, because there are still seas for this teacher and researcher to sail. Finally, Chapter V, in which I point out some of my bibliographical productions. All other academic and management production is proven in SEI and in the Lattes Curriculum; this Memoirl meets the requirements for promotion from the Associate Professor IV class to the Full Professor class in the Higher Education Career, as established by MEC Ordinance no. 98/2017, of October 3, 2013, and by Resolution no. 03/2017, of June 9, 2017, of the Board of Directors - Condir of the Federal University of Uberlândia - UFU. No. 982, of October 3, 2013, and Resolution No. 03/2017, of June 9, 2017, of the Board of Directors - Condir of the Federal University of Uberlândia - UFU, modified by Resolution SEI No. 05/2018, of August 22, 2018, of the Condir of UFU. 2024-11-14T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/29406 Title: A antropologia de Sartre. Gênese, teoria e método Abstract: The given study approaches the Historical and Structural Anthropology elaborated by Jean-Paul Sarte, which is portrayed in his work The Problem of Method. This approach is originated from a thesis: Sartre’s intellectual pathway, since its earlybeginnings, discusses the possibility of comprehending the human being in a synthetic form. To enunciate how the given anthropology was developed, the line of thought was divided into six moments: Firstly, we described the genesis of this anthropology, recalling theoretical and methodological questions brought up by Sartre since the 1930s. We pay special attention to the psychological method, as well as the incapacity of human sciences, still underdeveloped at that time, of providing suitable standards that could base this synthetic approach of the human being. In a second moment, we list all the main aspects of the said anthropology in Sartre's work The Problem of Method. In a third moment, we address Sartre's existential psychoanalysis, revealing its connections with his anthropology and portraying the possibilities of developing a Sartrean existential therapy. Fourthly, we cite Althussier’s works to clarify that Sartre's anthropology answered the problems created by the "sclerosis of marxism”, as well as to elucidate the repercussion of the given criticism within the “official marxism”. In a fifth moment, we present Sartre's criticism of Marx's structuralism. We conclude our study by recollecting the debate between Sartre and Lévi-Strauss. We compare both anthropologies, highlight Sartre's criticism of the structuralist method and point out the contemporaneity of Sartre's thought via his criticism of reductionism. Later on, we defend the resemblance between Sartre’s thesis and hermeneutics. 2020-05-22T00:00:00Z