https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/5165 2026-08-27T01:15:28Z 2026-08-27T01:15:28Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49847 2026-08-26T12:28:59Z 2026-07-27T00:00:00Z

Title: O envelhecimento como experiência vivida: corpo, intersubjetividade e temporalidade na fenomenologia de Husserl

2026-07-27T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49731 2026-08-22T06:26:25Z 2026-08-07T00:00:00Z

Title: A busca da origem da ideia de conexão necessária em Hume no Tratado e na Investigação: implicações para a proposta de ceticismo moderado Abstract: This study investigates the extent to which the reformulation of the idea of necessary connection in An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding remains consistent with Hume's proposal of mitigated scepticism presented in Section 1 of that work. To this end, it undertakes a comparative analysis of Hume's examination of the origin of the idea of necessary connection in A Treatise of Human Nature and An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, taking the copy principle as its theoretical foundation and employing the method of textual analysis. The comparison reveals significant methodological differences between the two works, particularly about the presentation of the problem and the reformulation of the explanation of the origin of the idea of necessary connection, bringing to light important interpretative issues. It concludes that these reformulations do not represent an abandonment of the philosophy developed in the Treatise but rather an adaptation of its exposition to the philosophical aims of the Enquiry, preserving the compatibility of the reformulation of the idea of necessary connection between cause and effect with the project of mitigated scepticism.

2026-08-07T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49675 2026-08-20T06:23:56Z 2025-09-22T00:00:00Z

Title: Platão e o problema do mal Abstract: Le présent travail enquête sur la présence et la nature du mal dans la philosophie platonicienne, en examinant s’il existe une théorie cohérente sur le sujet dans les Dialogues. On part de l’hypothèse que Platon admet différentes dimensions du mal : un mal négatif, structurel, inhérent à la condition du sensible en tant que réalité imparfaite ; et un mal positif, issu de l’ignorance de l’âme à l’égard du Bien. L’analyse envisage la centralité de l’Idée du Bien comme principe causal, sa relation avec la science et l’opinion, l’analogie du soleil, la distinction entre les amateurs de spectacle et ceux du savoir, la fonction de la dialectique et le mythe de la caverne. Le mal négatif est ensuite considéré comme imperfection ontologique découlant de l’inégalité entre l’intelligible et le sensible, à la lumière de la cosmologie du Timée, de la notion de khóra, de la limitation du Démiurge et de la coopération entre raison et nécessité. Le mal positif est également discuté, compris de façon relative comme effets inévitables de la limitation rationnelle, et de façon absolue comme actions humaines orientées par l’ignorance du Bien, notamment dans les dialogues Lois et Timée. Il est conclu que, bien que Platon ne formule pas une théorie systématique du mal, sa philosophie offre des éléments permettant de le comprendre à la fois comme phénomène nécessaire à l’imperfection du sensible et comme résultat du désordre de l’âme.

2025-09-22T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/49663 2026-08-26T16:27:44Z 2026-07-17T00:00:00Z

Title: Efetuação dos direitos humanos aos sujeitos queer: a crítica de Judith Butler aplicada a análise literária Abstract: In recent decades, debates on gender identities and sexual diversity have gained increasing prominence in the fields of philosophy, law, and the human sciences. This movement reflects profound social transformations that challenge traditional models of normativity that have historically structured understandings of the subject, the family, and citizenship. In this context, contemporary theories of gender performativity, particularly those developed by Judith Butler (2010; 2013; 2019; 2020; 2021; 2023), provide relevant conceptual tools for understanding how identities are socially produced, regulated, and, at the same time, potentially subverted. This dissertation is situated within this critical framework and investigates the relationships between Queer theory, legal normativity, and the recognition of dissident subjectivities, articulating philosophical reflection, literary analysis, and legal discussion. Its central motivation lies in the observation that, although significant reconfigurations have taken place in the field of civil rights and legal protection of Queer individuals in different countries, structural tensions persist between the formal recognition of these identities and the maintenance of social and institutional norms grounded in heteronormativity and gender binarism. Thus, the research problem guiding this study asks: in what ways do gender performativity theory and the contributions of Queer theory enable a critical understanding of the limitations and possibilities of legal recognition of Queer identities within contemporary normative systems? In response, the dissertation aims to analyze the relationships between Queer theory, legal normativity, and citizenship, seeking to understand how legal and cultural structures simultaneously regulate and enable the recognition of Queer subjects. The study examines the contribution of performativity to the critique of legal gender categories; analyzes law as both an instrument of exclusion and protection; and explores the tension between legal recognition and the persistence of heteronormative standards. Methodologically, the research adopts a qualitative and interdisciplinary approach, combining bibliographic research, philosophical analysis, legalcritical examination, and literary interpretation. The theoretical framework engages authors such as Michel Foucault (2022), Joan Riviere (2005), Gayle Rubin (2003; 2016), Julia Kristeva (2024), and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1915; 1978). In the literary domain, the analysis of O Arroz de Palma (Azevedo, 2011), The Handmaid’s Tale (Atwood, 2017), and Stella Manhattan (Santiago, 2011) explores narrative representations of tensions between identity, power, and social normativity, understanding literature as a site of meaning production that challenges theoretical categories. The study further distinguishes three levels of legal operation–positive law, institutional practices, and legal discourse–highlighting the gap between formal recognition and lived experience. Empirically, it considers national and international contexts through selected paradigmatic cases, including non-Western experiences such as the hijra category, in order to question the universality of identity frameworks. The dissertation concludes that the legal recognition of Queer identities constitutes a structurally ambivalent process, in which the expansion of protection coexists with the delimitation of intelligibility. Human rights are thus understood as a historically situated and contested field, in which forms of recognition are continuously reconfigured.

2026-07-17T00:00:00Z