https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/5143 2026-10-12T09:58:55Z 2026-10-12T09:58:55Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/50588 2026-10-10T06:20:33Z 2026-10-08T00:00:00Z

Title: Da skin ao patrimônio: propriedade, comercialização e sucessão de ativos virtuais em jogos digitais Abstract: This paper analyzes the legal nature ofvirtual assets traded in digital games — skins, virtual currencies, cosmetic and functional items — and the possibility oftheir transmission through inheritance under Brazilian law, despite the contractual classification platforms assign to these assets asthe object ofa mere, revocable and non-transferable license. It starts from the observation that the digital game industry moves billions of dollars, driven by microtransaction, loot box and battle pass models that create artificial scarcity and market value for purely digital items, a phenomenon clearly evidenced by the secondary market for Counter-Strike skins. The research then examines the contractual regime imposed by Valve (Steam), Riot Games and Epic Games, identifying clauses that deny users any property right and prohibit the transmission ofaccounts and items through succession, and weighs these clauses against the limits that the Consumer Protection Code, the Civil Code, the Software Act, the Brazilian Internet Civil Framework and the General Data Protection Law impose on developers' private autonomy. The study then qualifies virtual assets as intangible property, endowed with individualization, legally relevant scarcity and patrimonial content falling within article 83, item III, ofthe Civil Code, examining foreign precedents — such as Ajemian v. Yahoo! and the German Bundesgerichtshof's decision — and domestic regulatory trends, particularly Bill nº 4/2025, which proposes a reform ofthe Civil Code. Building on these foundations, the paper shows that the causa mortis transmission ofthese assets faces no dogmatic obstacle under the current succession regime, grounded in the saisine principle, and proposes a succession framework structured around three axes — interpretive, procedural and legislative — capable ofovercoming the contractual obstacles imposed by platforms. The research, ofa bibliographic and documentary nature, conducted through the deductive method and occasional recourse to the comparative method, concludes that the Brazilian civil law system already possesses the dogmatic tools needed to recognize the skin as transmissible property, with the main remaining challenge being the contractual and practical resistance of digital platforms.

2026-10-08T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/50451 2026-09-26T06:15:56Z 2024-04-15T00:00:00Z

Title: Soft power e colonialismo: o caso Saara Ocidental sob a ótica das relações de poder entre Brasil e Marrocos Abstract: This article aims to analyse the power relations, under the categories of hard and soft power, between Brazil and Morocco, linked to the conflict over the independence of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, commonly known as Western Sahara. In this sense, the aim of the paper is to investigate whether there are pre-existing links of "soft power" between Brazilian and Moroccan culture which, if proven, could be one of the reasons justifying Brazil's neutral stance in terms of supporting the Saharawi people and disapproving of the exploitation of the region's natural resources. In addition, as a theoretical reference for this article, authors were used whose studies and criticisms are based on a decolonial perspective of international law. Finally, in order to achieve the objectives described, this work used deductive methodology and qualitative bibliographical research.

2024-04-15T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/50422 2026-09-25T06:24:54Z 2026-07-24T00:00:00Z

Title: Os limites da intervenção estatal no planejamento familiar: a reprodução humana assistida e a efetividade dos direitos fundamentais das famílias homoafetivas Abstract: This article examines the limits of State action in family planning for same-sex families, focusing on assisted human reproduction and the absence of specific federal legislation governing the subject in Brazil. The study is based on the premise that family planning is a fundamental right guaranteed by the 1988 Federal Constitution, closely linked to the principles of human dignity, freedom, equality, and reproductive autonomy. Its objective is to determine whether the predominance of administrative regulations governing assisted reproduction, particularly those issued by the Federal Council of Medicine, combined with legislative omission, constitutes an indirect form of State intervention in the exercise of this fundamental right. To achieve this objective, the study adopts a deductive approach based on bibliographical and documentary research, analyzing the Federal Constitution, statutory legislation, case law of the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Court of Justice, regulations issued by the Federal Council of Medicine and the National Council of Justice, as well as specialized legal scholarship. The findings indicate that, although judicial developments have ensured the recognition of same-sex families as protected family entities and strengthened reproductive rights, the absence of comprehensive legislation leaves assisted human reproduction primarily regulated by administrative rules. It is concluded that this legislative gap undermines legal certainty and the full effectiveness of family planning, producing more significant impacts on same-sex families and demonstrating the need for comprehensive legislation consistent with the constitutional principles of human dignity, substantive equality, reproductive autonomy, and family pluralism.

2026-07-24T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/50352 2026-09-22T06:19:35Z 2026-02-27T00:00:00Z

Title: Dever de fundamentação das decisões judiciais e a teoria dos precedentes: reflexos do art. 489, § 1º, VI do CPC/15 e sua indeterminação conceitual Abstract: This dissertation analyzes the duty to state reasons for judicial decisions within the Brazilian legal system, from the perspective of Article 489, § 1, item VI, of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, and its correlation with the theory of precedents. The general objective is to delimit the normative scope of said provision, investigating whether the requirement to demonstrate distinguishing or overruling in order to depart from a previous judgment applies indistinctly to any decisional standard invoked by the party or if it is restricted to those endowed with binding effect. To this end, the dialectical approach method is adopted, with historical-comparative procedure and bibliographic and documentary research techniques. The study addresses the conceptual indeterminacy of the terms “súmula”, “jurisprudence”, and “precedente”, exploring the divergence between doctrinal currents that support the exhaustive nature of the list in Article 927 of the CPC and those that defend its exemplificative nature. The results demonstrate the existence of a dual control regime of justification, since, while the non-observance of binding standards - a category comprising the list of Article 927, local súmulas, and appeals with general repercussion - attracts the specific nullity of item VI, the disregard for persuasive precedent must be scrutinized under the general duty of argumentative engagement provided for in item IV. It is concluded that the efficacy of this model depends on a profound alteration in judicial culture, capable of overcoming the practice of "ementismo" (citation of headnotes) and understanding justification as the space where the authority of the precedent is legitimized by argumentative rationality, and not merely by hierarchical imposition.

2026-02-27T00:00:00Z