<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/18947" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/18947</id>
  <updated>2026-04-24T15:58:19Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-24T15:58:19Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Logística reversa no agronegócio brasileiro à luz da Lei 12.305/2010: ESG como ferramenta para garantia de equidade intergeracional</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48649" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48649</id>
    <updated>2026-04-24T06:27:09Z</updated>
    <published>2026-02-27T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Logística reversa no agronegócio brasileiro à luz da Lei 12.305/2010: ESG como ferramenta para garantia de equidade intergeracional
Abstract: This dissertation analyzes the National Solid Waste Policy, established by Law No.&#xD;
12,305/2010, as a fundamental legal instrument for promoting sustainable development in&#xD;
Brazil, focusing on the challenges and potential of agribusiness. It begins with a historicalevolutionary&#xD;
approach to the relationship between humans and the environment, highlighting&#xD;
how population growth, industrialization, and technological advancement have intensified the&#xD;
exploitation of natural resources and the generation of solid waste, demonstrating the&#xD;
importance of regulating environmental protection. The work examines how, since the&#xD;
promulgation of the 1988 Constitution, an ecologically balanced environment has been&#xD;
recognized as a fundamental right, and the economic order must observe environmental&#xD;
protection, thus demonstrating the role of Environmental Law as an instrument of social&#xD;
transformation. In this context, the National Solid Waste Policy is analyzed based on its&#xD;
principles, objectives, and instruments, with emphasis on shared responsibility for the product&#xD;
life cycle, reverse logistics, and the internalization of environmental costs, understood as&#xD;
essential mechanisms for reorganizing production and consumption patterns. Brazilian&#xD;
agribusiness is addressed as a strategic sector of the national economy and, at the same time,&#xD;
as a significant source of solid waste generation, such as pesticide packaging, agro-industrial&#xD;
waste, animal manure, and byproducts of agricultural processing. The research demonstrates&#xD;
that the proper management of these wastes can lead to the modernization of production, in&#xD;
addition to adding economic value to the sector and strengthening international&#xD;
competitiveness, especially in the face of increasing environmental, social, and governance&#xD;
demands. The role of the State as responsible for guiding the transformation towards&#xD;
sustainable agricultural practices is also analyzed, through integrated public policies,&#xD;
consistent environmental regulation, and the use of economic and financial instruments&#xD;
capable of guiding behaviors and internalizing environmental externalities. Agroecology and&#xD;
the National Policy on Agroecology and Organic Production are examined as expressions of&#xD;
new productive paradigms, compatible with the objectives of the National Solid Waste Policy&#xD;
and with the constitutional foundations of sustainable development. Finally, this work&#xD;
identifies structural challenges to the effective implementation of sustainability in Brazilian&#xD;
agribusiness, such as institutional fragmentation, regional inequalities, power asymmetry&#xD;
among economic agents, and the fragility of environmental oversight. It concludes that the&#xD;
effectiveness of the National Solid Waste Policy depends on integrated state action,&#xD;
institutional strengthening, and a constitutionally oriented interpretation of Environmental&#xD;
Law, capable of reconciling agricultural productivity, environmental protection, and&#xD;
intergenerational justice.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-02-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Educação antirracista no ensino médio: as contribuições dos movimentos teóricos sobre a aplicação da lei 10.639/03</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48579" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48579</id>
    <updated>2026-03-26T06:22:25Z</updated>
    <published>2025-02-21T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Educação antirracista no ensino médio: as contribuições dos movimentos teóricos sobre a aplicação da lei 10.639/03
Abstract: Consideration of ethnic-racial diversity is one of the principles of national education, along with equal conditions for access and permanence in school and the pluralism of ideas and pedagogical conceptions. The possibility of discussing anti-racism education in schools today is the result of a long historical process of struggle by black movements. Given the recorgnition tha Law nº 10.639/03 aims to challenge Eurocentric logic and promote the decolonization of knowledge in the school environment, the central question guiding our investigation was: In what ways do insurgente theretical perspectives – originating from the Black Movement and decolonial thought –underpin the implementation of the aforementioned law and contribute to the decolonization of curricula? Furthermore, what are the institucional limits na structural resistances within public schools that hinder the consolidation of these theories into an effectively anti-racist and tranformative praxis? We adopted a qualitative and situated approach, grounded in the perspective of the Black Movement as an "educating subject" (Gomes, 2017). This research was conducted through a bibliographic review and systematic analysis of national (SciELO and Google Scholar) and regional scientific production, spanning from 2019 to 2024. We prioritized mapping the production in the Repository of the Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU) to establish a territorialized nexus between academic theory and the practical reality of local public schools, where the researcher's teaching activity serves as a point of observation and socio-legal analysis. The general objective is to study Anti-Racist Education in High School, proposing a rupture with the dominant Eurocentric logic. To this end, we aim to meet the following specific objectives: 1) to study the application of Law No. 10,639/03 in High School through the perspectives of liberatory education and the problematization of whiteness; 2) to contextualize the challenges of implementing Law 10,639/03 based on recent production from the UFU Repository; and 3) to analyze discrimination in the school environment through the lenses of intersectionality and Lélia Gonzalez’s "Amefricanity." We conclude that, although the academic production from teaching degrees regarding Law No. 10,639/03 is exhaustive and consolidated, there remains a need for a socio-legal dialogue that translates this knowledge into the field of Law from the perspective of situated knowledge. We emphasize that addressing racial and gender inequalities in the school environment requires the application of Gonzalez's (2020) intersectionality and Amefricanity to unveil the specific oppressions that cross the trajectories of Black girls.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-02-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Quem decide o futuro? A disputa simbólica dos três poderes no caso das emendas parlamentares sob a lente da análise dialógica do discurso</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48440" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48440</id>
    <updated>2026-03-03T06:19:13Z</updated>
    <published>2026-02-12T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Quem decide o futuro? A disputa simbólica dos três poderes no caso das emendas parlamentares sob a lente da análise dialógica do discurso
Abstract: Who has the legitimacy to have the final say regarding the future of the State? Is it the Supreme Federal Court? The President of the Republic? The National Congress? Is it the Academy?&#xD;
&#xD;
In short, among so many possible agents, there is a clear institutional dispute over the benefit of the monopoly of the right to determine the future of the State and the transposition of the final outcome to substantive issues concerning fundamental rights and Brazilian political institutions. This is the trophy sought by agents in the political field, according to a Brazilian perspective that was identified during the proposed research, and who dispute among themselves the ultimate legitimacy to define what the future of the country should be. This master's research outlines the agents, tools, and positions that surround the aforementioned political field, as well as identifying the forms of symbolic domination exercised discursively among them. Thus, in addition to merely describing the field, the aim is to create a diagram of its institutional dynamics and propose an interpretative key to its intentions that are expressed through language, making use of dialogical discourse analysis. By uniting Bakhtin and Bourdieu, each with their own field of study, an interdisciplinary approach is proposed to address the questions posed, with the objective of ultimately identifying how agents in the legal field behave discursively in pursuit of the monopoly on the right to dictate the future of the State.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-02-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>O direito à proteção dos dados neurais sob a ótica do dever de segurança ao consumidor: limites ao desenvolvimento das interfaces cérebro computador</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48414" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/48414</id>
    <updated>2026-02-26T06:26:10Z</updated>
    <published>2026-02-19T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: O direito à proteção dos dados neurais sob a ótica do dever de segurança ao consumidor: limites ao desenvolvimento das interfaces cérebro computador
Abstract: This research addresses the problem of consumer vulnerability in the face of emerging &#xD;
neurotechnologies. Among these, brain-computer interfaces, the object of massive investments &#xD;
by global industries, present the greatest challenges to maintaining the protective scope of law, &#xD;
operationalized in the protection of individual and collective human rights. Therefore, the focus &#xD;
was on a detailed understanding of their functioning, the threats they represent, and the social, &#xD;
political, and legal repercussions arising from their offering and use by consumers. It was found &#xD;
that, in Brazil, there is no specific regulation in force to limit their development, a scenario that &#xD;
contributes to the susceptibility to exploitation and violation of users' fundamental rights by &#xD;
neurotechnology providers. Given this, and aiming to construct a specific response to the gap &#xD;
identified in the Brazilian legal system, the work used a hypothetical-deductive approach, based &#xD;
on the constitutional duty of security as a major premise, in light of which the propositions &#xD;
indispensable to its testing were formulated. The work's structure was divided into three parts, &#xD;
the first being predominantly conceptual and descriptive, dedicated to understanding the topic &#xD;
from different conceptual and analytical perspectives across multiple sciences. It highlighted &#xD;
neural data, neurotechnologies, and brain-computer interfaces, as well as the risks and legal &#xD;
formulations discussed within the regulatory framework: neurorights and neurolaw. Throughout &#xD;
the research, the foreign and national context was analyzed within the context of the Americas, &#xD;
both North and South, a selection based on the two main currents addressing the protection of &#xD;
neural data. Having assimilated the fundamental epistemological assumptions for addressing &#xD;
the problem, the research sought to condense the theoretical and political contributions &#xD;
presented in the first sections, suggesting a reinterpretation of neural data protection from a new &#xD;
analysis of Law and the available hermeneutical tools. In conclusion, it was found that despite &#xD;
the divergences and lack of consensus on fundamental points, a response from the State and &#xD;
legal professionals to the dangers of brain-computer interfaces is necessary. This presupposes &#xD;
the unavoidable task of establishing limits to their creation, offering, and use, not according to &#xD;
rigid and fixed rules established by law, but through the formulation of anchoring paradigms &#xD;
established according to the various sciences involved in the user's relationship with &#xD;
neurotechnologies. To this end, understanding Law as a system proved elementary and fostered &#xD;
the core guidelines for maintaining its ultimate objectives, enabling the interdisciplinary &#xD;
articulation of important points from medicine, philosophy, sociology, law, and technology &#xD;
around concentric angles of legal radiation and protection, under a critical and constructive &#xD;
approach to the protection of neural data.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-02-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

